When Mitt Romney first announced his candidacy for the White House, some news outlets wondered (and some still do) how Americans would react to the notion of a Mormon president running the country. Among the concerns and misconceptions about members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Mormons) is the issue of polygamy. The ironic thing about this concern is the following:
First, Mormons do not practice polygamy. The practice, which was adopted on a very limited basis, has not been part of the Mormon church since 1890. (Just to help with the math, that was 117 years ago!) Any member of the church found to be practicing or even approving of polygamous relationships is excommunicated. There is a zero tolerance policy.
Second, if one is concerned with the moral issues of men having multiple wives, why aren't we as outraged or shocked by the likes of Rudy Giuliani who is currently married to his fourth wife? I know that divorce is sometimes necessary and better for all involved, but you'd think that the odds of a man unknowingly falling into at least 3 non-salvageable relationships would be pretty slim. After all, how many people do you know that are on their fourth marriage? (I wonder what the odds are that this fourth marriage will be "the one"...)
CBS.com: The Women in Giuliani's Life
As an outside observer looking at the campaigns for these two men, this is what I see:
Mitt Romney has five sons who are all actively campaigning for their Dad. He is often shown in the arms of his large family spending time and playing with his grandchildren and children. Mitt's wife, Ann, has her own web site (http://www.annromney.com/) and is a successful mother and grandmother. She appears to be a sincere and genuine person who has battled a debilitating disease (M.S.) and who obviously knows what family values are.
In Mayor Giuliani's camp, we have a man who has more wives than children. None of Mr. Giuliani's children (or ex-wives) is actively campaigning for him. In fact, his only son Andrew went on national TV and appeared to campaign against his father. (ABC.com: Andrew Giuliani Dishes on Problems with Dad ) You won't see any web site from Giuliani's current wife espousing family values or highlighting her successes as a mother or grandmother for obvious reasons...she was his mistress before she was his wife, and she and Rudy Giuliani have no children together.
My intention in writing this piece is not so much to criticize Mayor Giuliani as it is to point out how ridiculous it is to be concerned about a Mormon running for President because of a limited practice that was abolished 117 years ago when we're not more concerned about another candidate who doesn't practice monogamy today, who lacks the support of his own children, and who has the potential to make Bill Clinton look like a devoted husband and father.
I agree with all those who think the issue of multiple wives is important when selecting a presidential candidate. I just think they're all worried about the wrong man.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Saturday, October 6, 2007
Monday Morning Quarterbacks...
How many times have you seen or listened to a sports analyst on a talk show who thinks a team or a player should have done something differently? The term Monday Morning Quarterback (or Armchair Quarterback) refers to all the fans, analysts, and other people who aren’t involved with the actual game who spend the following day criticizing and attacking the coaches, players, and referees for the plays they called, the throws they made (or didn’t make), the strategies they used, and the ultimate outcomes of their actions.
The funny thing about Monday Morning Quarterbacks is that they’re always right. They deftly identify and discuss every flaw and weakness in a team’s or player’s approach, and some misguided viewers or listeners might be wishing these analysts and talk show hosts had been coaching their favorite team or taking the snaps the night before. What people tend to forget is this: it’s easy to criticize and dissect a performance or a decision after the fact, and all discussions about a prior performance are subject to what is known as “outcome bias”. That is, our perception of whether a decision was right or not is always influenced by our knowledge of the actual outcome. It takes no leadership, very little critical thinking, and no foresight to prove a decision as being “wrong” when one has the negative outcome as proof. Unless a team’s or player’s performance was perfect (and let’s face it, they never are), then coming up with criticism is extremely easy.
A perfect example comes from the American League Championship Series in 2003. The Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees were playing a decisive Game 7 at Yankee Stadium to see which team would advance to the World Series. Pedro Martinez had pitched 7 dominant innings and held a 5-2 lead heading into the 8th inning. After getting the first out quickly and then giving up back-to-back hits (one that should have been caught by the center fielder) that closed the gap to 5-3, the Red Sox manager – Grady Little – walked to the mound to speak with his pitcher. After speaking with Martinez, Little decided to leave him in the game. – The next two batters doubled, and the game was quickly tied at 5 runs apiece. Little took a second trip to the mound and replaced Martinez with a relief pitcher. The Red Sox went on to lose the game in 11 innings, and Grady Little was vilified in the Boston and national media as a poor manager because he didn’t take Pedro Martinez out when he first visited the mound.
Looking back on the situation, it’s easy to criticize Grady Little’s decision – now that we’ve seen the results. But don’t forget that we are subject to this “outcome bias”. Pedro Martinez had thrown 104 pitches in the game to that point, and he (a first-ballot Hall of Fame pitcher) told Little he could get the next two outs. Grady Little had 2 relievers ready in the bullpen, but you’ll never see their bronze busts in Cooperstown.
The truth is, Grady Little did what most managers would have done in that situation. (If you’re thinking that I’m wrong…then you may be forgetting that you too are subject to this “outcome bias”!) Pedro Martinez was the team’s best pitcher, and the odds of him getting 2 more outs after having thrown 104 pitches were probably just as good as a journeyman relief pitcher doing the same after coming out of the bullpen.
The sad and irrational thing about this story is that Grady Little’s contract was not renewed based largely on this decision, his laudable success with the Red Sox has largely been forgotten, his time in Boston will be forever remembered for one negative outcome, and every commentator or fan who openly criticizes his decision is accepted as a genius. The most ironic thing about this example is that another manager – the Cubs’ Lou Piniella – was just criticized this week for taking his star pitcher out of a game too early in a similar situation. (Piniella Pulls Zambrano Too Early)
As I pointed out before, this “Armchair Quarterbacking” takes no leadership, no foresight (only hindsight…and we all know how good that is), involves no risk, and can’t be wrong. In short, it’s easy and almost cowardly to openly criticize and attack the person having to make a critical decision under pressure once the results have been made manifest.
Since this thought piece has gone on long enough, I’ll make my point and close for the day. Consider the following:
What if Game 7 of the ALCS was analogous to some important moments in our country’s recent history? Wouldn’t President Bush be playing the role of Grady Little? Perhaps some executive decisions have been as unsuccessful as leaving Pedro Martinez in to face 2 more batters. Certainly there have been others that have fared better. (After all, Grady Little must have done some things right to get the Red Sox into Game 7!) It's easy to identify those people who are the Monday Morning Quarterbacks that criticize every decision, highlight the negative outcomes, ignore the positive ones, and brashly proclaim that they would have done things differently.
I’m not saying that I would have made all the same decisions that President Bush has made over the past 7 years, but I’m also not claiming to have any idea of the enormous pressures, stresses, and information asymmetry problems that a Commander in Chief and Chief Executive of the United States must deal with. (I make enough of my own mistakes within my little sphere of influence!) What I am saying is this: “I don’t know what I would have done if I had been in his shoes. Nobody knows, and anyone who says they would have acted differently or would have made different choices is heavily influenced by the luxury of knowing the actual outcomes.”
So, if you’re ever caught thinking that a 45-year old sports analyst might make a better quarterback for your favorite team, imagine that same skinny talk show host suited up in pads and a helmet and lining up on a football field against today’s best athletes. How much better do you really think he’d fare?
The funny thing about Monday Morning Quarterbacks is that they’re always right. They deftly identify and discuss every flaw and weakness in a team’s or player’s approach, and some misguided viewers or listeners might be wishing these analysts and talk show hosts had been coaching their favorite team or taking the snaps the night before. What people tend to forget is this: it’s easy to criticize and dissect a performance or a decision after the fact, and all discussions about a prior performance are subject to what is known as “outcome bias”. That is, our perception of whether a decision was right or not is always influenced by our knowledge of the actual outcome. It takes no leadership, very little critical thinking, and no foresight to prove a decision as being “wrong” when one has the negative outcome as proof. Unless a team’s or player’s performance was perfect (and let’s face it, they never are), then coming up with criticism is extremely easy.
A perfect example comes from the American League Championship Series in 2003. The Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees were playing a decisive Game 7 at Yankee Stadium to see which team would advance to the World Series. Pedro Martinez had pitched 7 dominant innings and held a 5-2 lead heading into the 8th inning. After getting the first out quickly and then giving up back-to-back hits (one that should have been caught by the center fielder) that closed the gap to 5-3, the Red Sox manager – Grady Little – walked to the mound to speak with his pitcher. After speaking with Martinez, Little decided to leave him in the game. – The next two batters doubled, and the game was quickly tied at 5 runs apiece. Little took a second trip to the mound and replaced Martinez with a relief pitcher. The Red Sox went on to lose the game in 11 innings, and Grady Little was vilified in the Boston and national media as a poor manager because he didn’t take Pedro Martinez out when he first visited the mound.Looking back on the situation, it’s easy to criticize Grady Little’s decision – now that we’ve seen the results. But don’t forget that we are subject to this “outcome bias”. Pedro Martinez had thrown 104 pitches in the game to that point, and he (a first-ballot Hall of Fame pitcher) told Little he could get the next two outs. Grady Little had 2 relievers ready in the bullpen, but you’ll never see their bronze busts in Cooperstown.
The truth is, Grady Little did what most managers would have done in that situation. (If you’re thinking that I’m wrong…then you may be forgetting that you too are subject to this “outcome bias”!) Pedro Martinez was the team’s best pitcher, and the odds of him getting 2 more outs after having thrown 104 pitches were probably just as good as a journeyman relief pitcher doing the same after coming out of the bullpen.
The sad and irrational thing about this story is that Grady Little’s contract was not renewed based largely on this decision, his laudable success with the Red Sox has largely been forgotten, his time in Boston will be forever remembered for one negative outcome, and every commentator or fan who openly criticizes his decision is accepted as a genius. The most ironic thing about this example is that another manager – the Cubs’ Lou Piniella – was just criticized this week for taking his star pitcher out of a game too early in a similar situation. (Piniella Pulls Zambrano Too Early)
As I pointed out before, this “Armchair Quarterbacking” takes no leadership, no foresight (only hindsight…and we all know how good that is), involves no risk, and can’t be wrong. In short, it’s easy and almost cowardly to openly criticize and attack the person having to make a critical decision under pressure once the results have been made manifest.
Since this thought piece has gone on long enough, I’ll make my point and close for the day. Consider the following:
What if Game 7 of the ALCS was analogous to some important moments in our country’s recent history? Wouldn’t President Bush be playing the role of Grady Little? Perhaps some executive decisions have been as unsuccessful as leaving Pedro Martinez in to face 2 more batters. Certainly there have been others that have fared better. (After all, Grady Little must have done some things right to get the Red Sox into Game 7!) It's easy to identify those people who are the Monday Morning Quarterbacks that criticize every decision, highlight the negative outcomes, ignore the positive ones, and brashly proclaim that they would have done things differently.
I’m not saying that I would have made all the same decisions that President Bush has made over the past 7 years, but I’m also not claiming to have any idea of the enormous pressures, stresses, and information asymmetry problems that a Commander in Chief and Chief Executive of the United States must deal with. (I make enough of my own mistakes within my little sphere of influence!) What I am saying is this: “I don’t know what I would have done if I had been in his shoes. Nobody knows, and anyone who says they would have acted differently or would have made different choices is heavily influenced by the luxury of knowing the actual outcomes.”
So, if you’re ever caught thinking that a 45-year old sports analyst might make a better quarterback for your favorite team, imagine that same skinny talk show host suited up in pads and a helmet and lining up on a football field against today’s best athletes. How much better do you really think he’d fare?
Friday, October 5, 2007
What do you believe?
For the purpose of full disclosure, let’s say that I consider myself a conservative person. I’m officially registered to vote as an Independent, but I generally find myself voting for Republican candidates. Why, you might ask? Because of my core beliefs.
I believe marriage between a man and a woman is an institution ordained of God. I believe children have a God-given right to be born into a family with both a mother and a father, and I believe the family is the fundamental building block of our societies. I believe today’s shifting morals are breaking up the family and eroding the foundations of our existence.
I believe in smaller governments, lower taxes, capitalism, and generally efficient markets. Just because something is immoral or bad for us, I don’t believe it’s always the government’s place to legislate against it. I believe governments exist to protect the innocent and to serve and represent the people. I do not believe that people exist to serve and finance the government.
I believe judges are supposed to enforce and uphold the law, not to make it. I believe the accused deserve a fair trial, but I believe there should be consequences for our actions. People who make wise choices should be rewarded, and people who make poor choices should be penalized. I have zero tolerance for crimes against children and others who cannot protect themselves.
I believe people have an obligation to help the sick, needy, and poor, but I don’t believe that people should aspire to be sick, needy, or poor in order to receive free assistance. I believe in providing opportunities to many, but I don’t believe handing out opportunities and rewards freely builds anything but dependence. Just because one “red hen” has achieved success through hard work, I do not believe everyone around that person deserves some of his bread. (…but if I were that little red hen, I’d surely share some of my bread of my own free will…not because a law told me I had to.)
I believe I am blessed by God to live in this great country. I believe patriotism and American pride are good things, but I also believe that we should be good neighbors with others around the world. I believe that wars are sometimes necessary to protect the innocent, but I am a peace-loving person.
I believe war is a terrible experience for all involved. As such, they should be as short as possible. I believe armies should fight to win. I believe that a job worth doing is worth doing right, and a job done poorly will almost certainly come back to bite you in the end.
I believe in God. I believe in Jesus Christ. I believe that each of us in this great country has a responsibility to respect the freedoms and rights granted by our Founding Fathers (and Mothers). I believe in legal immigration, and I believe in legal emigration. I believe that if you don’t like being a part of the United States, you should consider the latter.
I believe marriage between a man and a woman is an institution ordained of God. I believe children have a God-given right to be born into a family with both a mother and a father, and I believe the family is the fundamental building block of our societies. I believe today’s shifting morals are breaking up the family and eroding the foundations of our existence.
I believe in smaller governments, lower taxes, capitalism, and generally efficient markets. Just because something is immoral or bad for us, I don’t believe it’s always the government’s place to legislate against it. I believe governments exist to protect the innocent and to serve and represent the people. I do not believe that people exist to serve and finance the government.
I believe judges are supposed to enforce and uphold the law, not to make it. I believe the accused deserve a fair trial, but I believe there should be consequences for our actions. People who make wise choices should be rewarded, and people who make poor choices should be penalized. I have zero tolerance for crimes against children and others who cannot protect themselves.
I believe people have an obligation to help the sick, needy, and poor, but I don’t believe that people should aspire to be sick, needy, or poor in order to receive free assistance. I believe in providing opportunities to many, but I don’t believe handing out opportunities and rewards freely builds anything but dependence. Just because one “red hen” has achieved success through hard work, I do not believe everyone around that person deserves some of his bread. (…but if I were that little red hen, I’d surely share some of my bread of my own free will…not because a law told me I had to.)
I believe I am blessed by God to live in this great country. I believe patriotism and American pride are good things, but I also believe that we should be good neighbors with others around the world. I believe that wars are sometimes necessary to protect the innocent, but I am a peace-loving person.
I believe war is a terrible experience for all involved. As such, they should be as short as possible. I believe armies should fight to win. I believe that a job worth doing is worth doing right, and a job done poorly will almost certainly come back to bite you in the end.
I believe in God. I believe in Jesus Christ. I believe that each of us in this great country has a responsibility to respect the freedoms and rights granted by our Founding Fathers (and Mothers). I believe in legal immigration, and I believe in legal emigration. I believe that if you don’t like being a part of the United States, you should consider the latter.
This is my country...
I've never been overly interested in politics, and I've never been involved in a political campaign. Other than wanting an honest, moral, and strong leader in any elected position (is that asking a lot?), I haven't really had too much interest in campaigns or elections.
Don't get me wrong, I've always gone and voted for the person I felt was the best candidate, but I never felt like it was my place to encourage others to follow my lead. In the past few years, however, I've felt a deeper interest in political ongoings and have become more interested in various candidates' positions, beliefs, and strategies for improving my state or our country.
As a 30-year old U.S. citizen, worker, husband, and father of 2.4 children, I have suddenly become aware that the political process in the United States is not only important for me to follow and become involved with, but it's imperative that I stand up and express my views on the happenings in our communities, our country, and our world. (Since I'm only 5' 10" tall, I'm going to "stand up" in the figurative sense and share my views in this blog.)
Over the next few months, I plan to express my personal views about issues that are important to me and - as a fellow American - issues that should be important to you.
After all, the song says, "This is my country..." for a reason.
Don't get me wrong, I've always gone and voted for the person I felt was the best candidate, but I never felt like it was my place to encourage others to follow my lead. In the past few years, however, I've felt a deeper interest in political ongoings and have become more interested in various candidates' positions, beliefs, and strategies for improving my state or our country.
As a 30-year old U.S. citizen, worker, husband, and father of 2.4 children, I have suddenly become aware that the political process in the United States is not only important for me to follow and become involved with, but it's imperative that I stand up and express my views on the happenings in our communities, our country, and our world. (Since I'm only 5' 10" tall, I'm going to "stand up" in the figurative sense and share my views in this blog.)
Over the next few months, I plan to express my personal views about issues that are important to me and - as a fellow American - issues that should be important to you.
After all, the song says, "This is my country..." for a reason.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Xbox 360: Day 22: Safe Returns
It took nearly a month, but my Xbox 360 returned home two days ago.
Actually, to say that my Xbox returned home wouldn't be entirely true. Because they're so backed up with repairs, Microsoft sent me someone else's refurbished system to speed up the process. Once my old system is repaired, it will no doubt be sent out to someone else sometime in the next few weeks.
I fired up the system and played a game to make sure it was working properly. All seems fine for the first day or two, but I can't say I'm overly optimistic about the long-term durability of this system now. (I almost bought a Nintendo Wii this morning...)
As a "gift" for the inconvenience of dealing with my Xbox being gone for a month, Microsoft included a free month to Xbox Live - a service I already subscribe to.
Overall, the process of getting my Xbox to the repair center and home again was less painful than I had expected, but the real test of quality and customer service will take hours and hours of playing games and watching movies on the system to make sure the new hardware is better than the old stuff. Fortunately, I'm up to the task!
Actually, to say that my Xbox returned home wouldn't be entirely true. Because they're so backed up with repairs, Microsoft sent me someone else's refurbished system to speed up the process. Once my old system is repaired, it will no doubt be sent out to someone else sometime in the next few weeks.
I fired up the system and played a game to make sure it was working properly. All seems fine for the first day or two, but I can't say I'm overly optimistic about the long-term durability of this system now. (I almost bought a Nintendo Wii this morning...)
As a "gift" for the inconvenience of dealing with my Xbox being gone for a month, Microsoft included a free month to Xbox Live - a service I already subscribe to.
Overall, the process of getting my Xbox to the repair center and home again was less painful than I had expected, but the real test of quality and customer service will take hours and hours of playing games and watching movies on the system to make sure the new hardware is better than the old stuff. Fortunately, I'm up to the task!
Saturday, August 25, 2007
Xbox 360: Day 19 - Good News
After nearly 3 weeks without my Xbox 360, I finally received some good news on Thursday. I received an e-mail from MSFT that my system had been shipped and that I should expect it within 3-5 days.
As I write this, the system has arrived in Tucson, and I expect it will be delivered on Monday.
My concern as the system comes back is whether or not the "fix" is going to hold out for very long. I've heard horror stories of people who have had to send their systems back multiple times because the "fix" didn't help anything. Some people aren't even getting their own system back, they get a refurbished replacement instead.
When it comes on Monday, I'll post to let you know how it looks.
As I write this, the system has arrived in Tucson, and I expect it will be delivered on Monday.
My concern as the system comes back is whether or not the "fix" is going to hold out for very long. I've heard horror stories of people who have had to send their systems back multiple times because the "fix" didn't help anything. Some people aren't even getting their own system back, they get a refurbished replacement instead.
When it comes on Monday, I'll post to let you know how it looks.
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
QuestionPro.com
For those who need to create on-line surveys using a simple tool, one should consider using QuestionPro.com and their services. They offer a free 30-day trial and a free 6-month license to students and a free 12-month license for universities.
One of the only "catches" with their services is that they require you to post a link to their site on a web site or blog site, which explains my decision to post about them here.
If you're interested in learning more about their products, try going to www.questionpro.com and clicking around to see what they have to offer.
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Xbox 360: Day 5: Ship to Repair Center
The box to ship my Xbox 360 to the repair center arrived yesterday from Microsoft. The box had some styrofoam padding, a plastic bag, and instructions for returning the console to the repair center in Texas. The instructions indicated that repairs could take 4-6 weeks...ouch!
The instructions were easy enough to follow, so I sealed up the console, placed it gently into the box, sealed it up, and drove down to the UPS Store to ship it off to Texas. When I walked into the store, I knew the problem with the flashing lights was bigger than even I had anticipated. Before I got to the counter carrying the box, the young lady working the register looked at me, looked at the box, and said, "Is that another Xbox 360?" Apparently, there have been a large number of consoles being shipped through this local store, and she mentioned that many of them appear to be "flashing red light" problems that occurred around one year after purchase.
If the local UPS store can pick out the repair box by sight, Microsoft has got a bigger problem on their hands than even the media is letting on. When I first saw the 4-6 week timeline for getting my Xbox back, I was disappointed. Now that I'm beginning to understand how big this problem is, I'm hoping to get it back before Christmas!
Thursday, August 9, 2007
Xbox 360: 3 days...Little Progress
It has now been 3 days since I submitted my on-line warranty registration for my Xbox 360 and the "ring of death" exhibited by the 3 flashing red lights around the power button.
So far, I have received an e-mail confirmation telling me that Microsoft is aware of my problem and that they are shipping me a box so I can send them my 360 at no charge.
Do you think it's a bad sign that Microsoft has placed a large "Console Repair" section on their http://www.xbox.com/ home page? If this is something they're having to place prominently on their home page, I suspect that it might take more than the estimated $1B to cover the number of repairs they must be making.
Perhaps in an effort to offset some of the negative press (and negative referrals from system owners) they're likely receiving, Microsoft has just lowered the cost of their system.
Time will tell how damaging this quality-control issue will be in the console wars now that Sony has reduced their prices and now that the Nintendo Wii is becoming increasingly available. Can Microsoft and the Xbox 360 retain the lead they built up by releasing early, or will these console repairs knock them back to the pack? I know MSFT and Bungie are counting on Halo 3 to carry the show in the fall, but nobody will be playing with Master Chief if their 360s are sitting in a repair warehouse somewhere.
So far, I have received an e-mail confirmation telling me that Microsoft is aware of my problem and that they are shipping me a box so I can send them my 360 at no charge.
Do you think it's a bad sign that Microsoft has placed a large "Console Repair" section on their http://www.xbox.com/ home page? If this is something they're having to place prominently on their home page, I suspect that it might take more than the estimated $1B to cover the number of repairs they must be making.
Perhaps in an effort to offset some of the negative press (and negative referrals from system owners) they're likely receiving, Microsoft has just lowered the cost of their system.
Time will tell how damaging this quality-control issue will be in the console wars now that Sony has reduced their prices and now that the Nintendo Wii is becoming increasingly available. Can Microsoft and the Xbox 360 retain the lead they built up by releasing early, or will these console repairs knock them back to the pack? I know MSFT and Bungie are counting on Halo 3 to carry the show in the fall, but nobody will be playing with Master Chief if their 360s are sitting in a repair warehouse somewhere.
Monday, August 6, 2007
Xbox 360: The 3 Flashing Lights
Like many Xbox 360 owners who purchased their systems just over a year ago, I was saddened - though not terribly surprised - to see my next-generation gaming system go the way of thousands of others when the three red flashing lights appeared this past weekend.
What do the three flashing red lights mean? I'm sure there's some technical code embedded in the sequence of the lights, but the flashing lights simply mean "game over" for those of us who have spent upwards of $1,000 on the system, hard drive, wireless controllers, games, other accessories, and an Xbox Live subscription to play on-line. When the 3 red lights flash around the power button on your 360, the system won't boot up, and the only real option is to call up Microsoft and ask them to repair your system.
I mentioned above that I wasn't terribly surprised to see the problem. Did I treat my system poorly and expect something tragic to happen as a result of my neglect? NO! Quite the contrary. To my wife's chagrin, I might be accused of treating my Xbox 360 more carefully than I do a newborn child. The reason I wasn't surprised to see the problem is because it has become shockingly common for 360s to display the "ring of death" after one year of use. The problem has become so pervasive that Microsoft (NSDQ Ticker: MSFT) has had to extend the warranty for this particular problem from 90 days to 1 year to the current 3-year warranty coverage - all because of the seeming ubiquity of this problem.
I completed the on-line application for service on my 360 this morning, and I am currently waiting to hear back from Microsoft regarding the process for shipping my system to them for repairs. What was once a 10-day turnaround may now be expected to last more than 4 weeks due to the dramatic increase in the number of claims that arose when Microsoft extended the warranty coverage to three years instead of one - a telling indicator that many of the issues appear just after one year of use.
As I ship off my system and wait for its return, not only will I miss out on the fun of playing games, but I miss out on time and money because of my pre-paid Xbox Live subscription. We shall see if Microsoft makes some attempt to compensate me for my loss.
I will continue to chronicle this situation on my blog and share my experiences with Microsoft and their customer service department. Here's to hoping that a multi-billion dollar corporation with more technical knowledge and talented employees can fix this problem in an effective and efficient manner.
To read more about this problem, visit the following links:
Microsoft.com: Description of Problem
CNET.com: Xbox 360 Gamers Get the Shaft
TeamXbox.com: The Red Ring of Death
Saturday, August 4, 2007
Barry Bonds...
As Barry Bonds approaches Hank Aaron's all-time home run record of 755 home runs, the world of baseball seems divided regarding how this accomplishment should be recognized, if at all. Many people outside of San Francisco feel that his record should be ignored or have an asterisk next to it to indicate that this feat took place in the "steroids era" of baseball. Though I strongly believe steroids should be banned from professional sports and young kids should be taught to avoid them, I'm not as tough on Barry as others seem to be. For the sake of fairness, let me make some arguments as to why his eventual passing of Hammerin' Hank should be celebrated, not shunned:
For those who are focusing on the amazing offensive numbers he has been posting since 1999, I remind you that Barry had 446 home runs before that season - no small feat for any player in a full career. He also had a .408 on-base percentage prior to that season, which is phenomenal.. (His OBP has increased to .444 as pitchers would rather walk him than risk being his next victim.) He had already joined the 40-40 club (40 home runs & 40 stolen bases in the same season) in 1996 - a club that has only 3 members in the history of baseball.
Before 1999, Barry Bonds had already driven in 1216 runs, had walked 1357 times, had scored 1364 runs, had stolen 445 bases, and had nearly 2,000 hits. He had also won 4 gold gloves, 2 NL MVPs, and the ESPN Male Athlete of the Year (1994) award. Remember - all of this occurred before his "anomaly year" of 1999. In the mind of most baseball analysts, Barry was a lock for the Hall of Fame before there were any serious allegations of steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs in baseball.
There are those who argue that his body's growth and added weight are sure signs of steroid use. One might counter by pointing out that we've been watching Barry on TV for the past 22 years. Who doesn't gain 20 pounds between the ages of 21 and 43? Those of us who sit in cubicles pack on the pounds around the waist, but someone like Barry who spends his life in a gym and who has a personal chef, nutritionist, and weight trainer might be more efficient with his weight gain.
Those who argue that Barry's record will be tainted by steroids should also be clamoring that Jose Canseco's AL MVP and Ken Caminiti's NL MVP awards should be stripped from the record books. Why do we not see asterisk signs and syringes - or better yet, cork - being thrown onto the field whenever the Rangers and Sammy Sosa come to town? Also, how much should we water down Babe Ruth's career home run total for balls that bounced over the fence? (For part of Ruth's career, balls that bounced over the fence were counted as home runs.) The truth is that every era had its own unique traits, and Barry Bonds has dominated through 3 decades of baseball. Regardless of which era you put him in, he is one of the all-time greatest.
How can you quantify the effect of alleged steroid use on Barry? Would the balls that land in McCovey Cove in San Francisco be bouncing off the sidewalk instead of bobbing in the water? Would upper-deck blasts have landed in the lower decks without the help of steroids? Perhaps you feel the steroids help keep the athlete fit and energized, but what about the negative effects of added weight and muscle mass on his joints and bones (not to mention the many other negative side effects)? Do steroids have the ability to help the man improve his hand-eye coordination and mental focus to the point where he can see pitchers intentionally throwing outside of the strike zone all night and to have the patience to wait for one he can crush - and then help him to actually crush it when that single errant throw enters the strike zone?
Perhaps you feel like his distaste for the media and his cantankerous attitude with fans and teammates should be reason for not recognizing his accomplishments. If that were the case, we would also have to ignore the likes of Ty Cobb, Mickey Mantle, and a bunch of other "legends" who were notoriously disagreeable with the media, fans, and teammates and who were involved with alcohol problems or illegal drugs off the field.
If you simply look at the number of home runs he has been hitting over the past 10 years as proof of something artificial, consider that the entire league's offensive numbers are exploding over that same time period, so to see Barry Bonds jump by some percentage in his offensive production is not far out-of-line with the average increase in offensive production across the league.
If you want to really consider how amazing Barry Bonds is, consider this: Barry will tie and pass Hank Aaron in 300+ fewer games and 2500+ fewer at bats than the Hammer took to get to 755. That's the equivalent of nearly 4 full seasons of extra at bats that Hank Aaron used to get to this point. If Bonds had 4 extra seasons to swing away (and if pitchers would dare throw him a strike), we might be talking about 955 instead of 755!
Those who have admired and watched Barry Bonds and the way he plays the game of baseball (notice I didn't say his personality) are not terribly surprised by the milestones he's currently achieving. Though I do not like his personality and his demeanor off the field, Barry has always been the consummate professional on the field (imagine how you would react to getting ridiculed, mocked, and walked as much as he does on a daily basis) and has provided more than 20 years of spectacular and exciting baseball for fans to observe.
I have trouble embracing Barry Bonds and what he has unwillingly come to represent, but it's sad to me that Barry's excellence and incredible God-given talents are being overlooked because shadows of doubt that have fallen on the entire league have found a way to linger longer on the greatest offensive player of all-time.
Saturday, July 28, 2007
Made in the USA?
I remember a time some years ago when you would go to the store and find products that were proudly displayed as being "Made in the USA". These products were advertised using an American flag or some other patriotic emblem promoting them as products manufactured domestically. At the time, it was popular and patriotic to support these products over other foreign-made substitutes in attempts at rewarding American ingenuity and at reducing our country's dependancy on foreign economies.
As I read a recent article on CNN.com, I was struck by something that I hadn't really noticed. Those "Made in the USA" stickers aren't nearly as common, and it seems the popular thing to do is to buy foreign-made products in lieu of products manufactured within the United States. The article on CNN (Avoiding Chinese Food Products Nearly Impossible) tells of a woman and her family who have tried to minimize their support of food products that are "Made in China". She talks of how difficult it is to find any products today that are not manufactured overseas - mostly in China. As I read the article and considered the issue, I started to look around the room at the products within reach. Here's what I found:
The major components of my Dell desktop computer are all Made in China.
Virtually every piece of my Dell laptop is Made in China.
My Nokia cell phone is Made in China.
My Uniden home phone is Made in China.
My box of Kleenex tissues is Made in the USA.
My Compaq PDA is Made in Taiwan.
My Canon camera is Made in Japan.
My Hyundai Sonata is Made in Korea.
My Toyota Corolla is Made in Japan.
My Lance Armstrong LiveStrong bracelet is Made in China.
The keyboard I'm typing on and the mouse I'm using are both Made in China.
The lamp on my desk is Made in China.
My Vaseline Intensive Care lip balm is Made in the USA.
My sunglasses are Made in Italy.
My paper shredder is Made in China.
My Logitech web camera is Made in China.
My two office chairs are both Made in China.
My Orbit chewing gum is Made in Canada.
My stapler is Made in China.
Needless to say, I started to notice a disturbing trend when I started picking up every object in reach and checking where it was manufactured. Very few of the items I own - and even fewer items that involve plastic - are manufactured within the United States or even in North America. Virtually all of the items I use on a daily basis are Made in China or in some other country in the Far East.
I realize that many of the companies that own and sell the products I use are American companies whose profits are taxed in the USA, but that ever-expanding search for strong profit margins and reduced production costs has driven a significant amount of manufacturing outside of North America.
I do not know the full effect this increasing dependance on China has had on our economy, but I don't think it mere coincidence that China and India - two of the countries receiving most of the U.S. outsourcing - have seen their economies explode with growth over the past decade and that the international value of the U.S. dollar has steadily declined over that same period.
If American companies continue to outsource increasing amounts of manufacturing and service operations to countries overseas, then I expect the U.S. dollar to continue to decline in value and foreign import taxes to continue to climb. I expect the economies of China and India to continue to grow and expand and to threaten the United States as the world's primary economic superpower.
It was just ten years ago that I remember seeing the "Made in the USA" sitckers promoted and displayed prevalently. I can only wonder - and worry about - what the state of our economy and our dependance on foreign manufacturuers and service providers will be in another ten years.
Monday, July 9, 2007
Shuttle Atlantis Returns to Earth...
In a relatively unheralded return to earth last week, the space shuttle Atlantis and crew made a thrilling and risky - but safe - return to earth following the shuttle's trip to space and the international space station.It's relatively rare to see first-hand, close-up pictures of the space shuttle, but I was able to obtain some pictures and the following story from a friend of a friend of a friend... (you get the idea).
Here's what this "friend" had to say about the shuttle's landing at Edwards Air Force Base:
"Living here at Edwards AFB gave our family the opportunity to see the Space Shuttle come in from space. Several people have been fascinated by our experience, so I thought I would share it with all.
Thursday night we watched as the shuttle trailed behind the space station in the night sky in preparation for its return to earth. I am on the medical response team here at Edwards, so we met early Monday morning to prepare for a possible return to Edwards. 
Happily, we got tagged this time. From the time of decision until the shuttle lands on the ground is about 90 minutes or so. We spotted the shuttle about 2 and a half to 3 minutes before it landed - while it was still at about 30,000 feet. 30 seconds later we heard the characteristic sonic boom.My admiration skyrocketed for the pilots of the shuttles. Without any engines they glide the shuttle from space where it is flying at tens of thousands of miles per hour onto a little runway on earth and land it on a dime."
Friday, July 6, 2007
The Trouble Tree
A friend of mine sent me a link to this short slide show that teaches an important lesson about dealing with the everday challenges and troubles of life.
Enjoy watching The Trouble Tree.
Enjoy watching The Trouble Tree.
Wednesday, July 4, 2007
Happy Independence Day!
John Adams assumed that July 2 would be celebrated as our nation’s birthday, not July 4, because it was on the second day of the month that Congress actually adopted the Declaration of Independence.
Allowing for that inconsequential variation, I invite you to join with me in reflecting on the majesty of Adams’ words as written to his beloved Abigail:
“The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. It will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated … by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of the continent to the other, from this time forward forever.”
The significance of Adams’ writing is not merely its prescience (he describes a pretty typical modern Fourth of July celebration) but the subordination of that celebration to “acts of devotion to God Almighty.”
Let’s recall these words as we celebrate our “great anniversary Festival” today.
We often ask God to bless America. On July 4, Americans should remember to take time and bless God.
Allowing for that inconsequential variation, I invite you to join with me in reflecting on the majesty of Adams’ words as written to his beloved Abigail:
“The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. It will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated … by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of the continent to the other, from this time forward forever.”
The significance of Adams’ writing is not merely its prescience (he describes a pretty typical modern Fourth of July celebration) but the subordination of that celebration to “acts of devotion to God Almighty.”
Let’s recall these words as we celebrate our “great anniversary Festival” today.
We often ask God to bless America. On July 4, Americans should remember to take time and bless God.
Saturday, June 23, 2007
Tough on Crime...
In Maricopa County near Phoenix, a Sheriff named Joe Arpaio has taken a tough stance on crime and confinement over the past 15 years. 
Sheriff Joe is becoming known around the world as the sheriff who provides a major incentive for criminals to stay out of jail. Among his rules in the jail are the following:
Sheriff Joe's tough stance on living conditions in jail has drawn the ire of various civil rights organizations who apparently think criminals in jail deserve rest, relaxation, health club membership rights, cable TV, movies, vices such as cigarettes, coffee, and pornography, and the avoidance of physical labor. Though these opposing groups threaten Sheriff Joe and conduct constant smear campaigns, he is routinely re-elected by the people of Maricopa County in overwhelming fashion. Who wouldn't want a sheriff that's this tough on crime protecting your community and your home?
If inmates complain about the conditions in the prison, Sheriff Joe tells them two things:
First, jail isn't meant to be a luxury hotel. If you don't like the conditions in jail, don't commit crimes that will land you there!
Second, it hardly seems right for criminals in the United States to enjoy better living conditions than the heroic men and women of the military who are struggling and suffering in harm's way to protect our liberties and freedoms from terrorists.
If all prisons and jails were more like Sheriff Joe's, I suspect our recidivism rate in the United States would dramatically decrease.
Sheriff Joe is becoming known around the world as the sheriff who provides a major incentive for criminals to stay out of jail. Among his rules in the jail are the following:
- Inmates are issued pink boxer shorts, socks, and towels as standard issues. Their outer clothing is black and white striped prison suits as seen in old-fashioned movies.
- Coffee is not permitted because it lacks nutritional value.
- Smoking and pornographic materials are not permitted since they have no positive value.
- Inmates must pay for their own meals, which cost less than 50 cents each.
- Inmates are assigned to be part of a "chain gang" working in the community. (To avoid discriminating against women, there are female chain gangs as well.)
- Since cable TV is required by federal law, Sheriff Joe has the Disney channel and the Weather channel permitted, but he blocks all other cable channels.
- Inmates are not permitted access to weight rooms. If they want to work out, they get their exercise on the chain gangs.
Sheriff Joe's tough stance on living conditions in jail has drawn the ire of various civil rights organizations who apparently think criminals in jail deserve rest, relaxation, health club membership rights, cable TV, movies, vices such as cigarettes, coffee, and pornography, and the avoidance of physical labor. Though these opposing groups threaten Sheriff Joe and conduct constant smear campaigns, he is routinely re-elected by the people of Maricopa County in overwhelming fashion. Who wouldn't want a sheriff that's this tough on crime protecting your community and your home?
If inmates complain about the conditions in the prison, Sheriff Joe tells them two things:First, jail isn't meant to be a luxury hotel. If you don't like the conditions in jail, don't commit crimes that will land you there!
Second, it hardly seems right for criminals in the United States to enjoy better living conditions than the heroic men and women of the military who are struggling and suffering in harm's way to protect our liberties and freedoms from terrorists.
If all prisons and jails were more like Sheriff Joe's, I suspect our recidivism rate in the United States would dramatically decrease.
Friday, June 22, 2007
Political Humor: The Barber
Here's a cute little political joke I found funny. I think it takes a humorous jab at both Republicans and Democrats, and I thought it was funny. Enjoy!
One day a florist goes to a barber for a haircut. After the cut he asked about his bill and the barber replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week". The florist is pleased and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open there is a thank you card and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door.
Later, a cop comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The cop is happy and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open up there is a thank you card and a dozen donuts waiting for him at his door.
Later a Republican comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot take money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The Republican is very happy and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open, there is a thank you card and a dozen different books such as "How to Improve Your Business" and "Becoming More Successful."
Then a Democrat comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The Democrat is very happy and leaves the shop.
The next morning when the barber goes to open up, there are a dozen Democrats lined up waiting for a free haircut.
One day a florist goes to a barber for a haircut. After the cut he asked about his bill and the barber replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week". The florist is pleased and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open there is a thank you card and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door.
Later, a cop comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The cop is happy and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open up there is a thank you card and a dozen donuts waiting for him at his door.
Later a Republican comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot take money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The Republican is very happy and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open, there is a thank you card and a dozen different books such as "How to Improve Your Business" and "Becoming More Successful."
Then a Democrat comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The Democrat is very happy and leaves the shop. The next morning when the barber goes to open up, there are a dozen Democrats lined up waiting for a free haircut.
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Trashing our Border...
Several environmental groups have recently opposed the icreased usage of helicopters and other motorized vehicles in patroling the United States' southern border. The reason they are protesting this increased vigilance at the border has nothing to do with the people living near or crossing over the boder - it has to do with the animals who might be disturbed and annoyed by the impact of noise, vibrations, and pollution produced by vehicles operating in their natural habitat.
At first glance, one might think their arguments deserve some consideration. When one considers, however, the massive amounts of land being patroled by the U.S. Border Patrol and the increasing number of illegal aliens infiltrating our country each day, one would also have to think that the risk of waking up some sleeping animals is secondary to our national security.
Also of interest when you consider the environmental groups who are aggressively opposing these efforts to protect our country's border is the fact that these same groups do not appear overly concerned with the tons of clothing, plastic, dirty diapers, glass, and other garbage strewn among these natural habitats by illegal immigrants entering our country each day.
When I say tons of garbage, I don't speak figuratively, but literally...and I understate the severity of the problem by not pointing out the hundreds and thousands of tons of garbage being deposited in our nation's wilderness and nature reserves by those who choose to invade our country. (Dropping your garbage as you cross the border to break our laws isn't the best way to make a good first impression!)
I've talked before about the economic, cultural, and political effects of illegal immigration, but this is another example of the negative consequences of illegal immigration. The next time you think about giving of your time or resources to help protect some of our world's natural environments, first think about the hundreds of miles along the southern U.S. border that are being desecrated each day with tons of garbage as an illegal alien's first act on U.S. soil.
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Too little, too late?
Roger Clemens is expected to join the New York Yankees on Monday night in Chicago. Clemens is expected to pitch against the White Sox in his first start of the season which he, and millions of Yankees' fans around the globe, hopes will be a catalyst in turning around New York's season.
Nobody is hoping - and risking - more for a dramatic turnaround than Yankees' owner George Steinbrenner. "The Boss" is paying Roger Clemens just over $1M for every expected start during the regular season which would make the Rocket the highest paid player in baseball, on a pro-rated basis. If Clemens can't help the Yankees reach the post-season, that money will be utterly wasted.
One might ask - and I'm sure Steinbrenner is asking this himself - if the Yankees should even activate Roger Clemens from the minor leagues next week. Why wouldn't they? Well, consider the potential return on the investment the Yankees are making:
1) Roger Clemens will not produce additional ticket or concession revenue unless he helps the team make the playoffs. Yankee Stadium sells out every night, so having Roger Clemens on the mound does not increase the number of fans in the seats.
2) TV contracts and other revenue sources are largely pre-determined and will not significantly change as a result of Clemens' return for a single season. If the Rocket was expected to pitch for the Yankees for several season to come, this might be a factor to consider.
3) The Yankees will be forced to pay a substantial luxury tax as a result of adding Clemens' salary to their already bloated payroll. By paying Clemens to join the team, Steinbrenner and the Yankees are essentially subsidizing the payrolls of 4 or 5 other Major League ballclubs who may compete with the Yankees in future seasons.
4) When Clemens made his announcement and the Yankees agreed to this contract, New York was 5.5 games behind the Red Sox in the standings - a significant but tolerable deficit. As of today, the Yankees are an astounding 13.5 games behind the Red Sox and appear to be fading fast in the AL East and Wild Card standings. By the time Clemens makes his first start, it's conceivable that the Yankees could be 15 games out and in last place in the AL East.
5) If the Yankees call up Clemens, they are essentially locked in to paying him the full $21M and the entire luxury tax penalty associated with his additional salary. If they don't activate him from the minor leagues, they wouldn't have to pay him a penny and wouldn't have to pay the heavy luxury tax fine.
Though I doubt Steinbrenner and the Yankees would be willing to let Roger walk at this point - after all, Boston might pick him up and bury the Yankees for good - I do believe his return will prove to be too little help too late in the season. Not only will New York spend a shocking amount of money for an additional 10 to 12 wins this season, but they'll also help subsiduze other teams' future payrolls and will likely miss the playoffs for the first time in most of their fans' memory.
Is it too little, too late? Only time will tell, but Steinbrenner still has a few days to pull the plug on a $21M gamble with the odds stacked against him!
Nobody is hoping - and risking - more for a dramatic turnaround than Yankees' owner George Steinbrenner. "The Boss" is paying Roger Clemens just over $1M for every expected start during the regular season which would make the Rocket the highest paid player in baseball, on a pro-rated basis. If Clemens can't help the Yankees reach the post-season, that money will be utterly wasted.
One might ask - and I'm sure Steinbrenner is asking this himself - if the Yankees should even activate Roger Clemens from the minor leagues next week. Why wouldn't they? Well, consider the potential return on the investment the Yankees are making:
1) Roger Clemens will not produce additional ticket or concession revenue unless he helps the team make the playoffs. Yankee Stadium sells out every night, so having Roger Clemens on the mound does not increase the number of fans in the seats.
2) TV contracts and other revenue sources are largely pre-determined and will not significantly change as a result of Clemens' return for a single season. If the Rocket was expected to pitch for the Yankees for several season to come, this might be a factor to consider.
3) The Yankees will be forced to pay a substantial luxury tax as a result of adding Clemens' salary to their already bloated payroll. By paying Clemens to join the team, Steinbrenner and the Yankees are essentially subsidizing the payrolls of 4 or 5 other Major League ballclubs who may compete with the Yankees in future seasons.
4) When Clemens made his announcement and the Yankees agreed to this contract, New York was 5.5 games behind the Red Sox in the standings - a significant but tolerable deficit. As of today, the Yankees are an astounding 13.5 games behind the Red Sox and appear to be fading fast in the AL East and Wild Card standings. By the time Clemens makes his first start, it's conceivable that the Yankees could be 15 games out and in last place in the AL East.
5) If the Yankees call up Clemens, they are essentially locked in to paying him the full $21M and the entire luxury tax penalty associated with his additional salary. If they don't activate him from the minor leagues, they wouldn't have to pay him a penny and wouldn't have to pay the heavy luxury tax fine.
Though I doubt Steinbrenner and the Yankees would be willing to let Roger walk at this point - after all, Boston might pick him up and bury the Yankees for good - I do believe his return will prove to be too little help too late in the season. Not only will New York spend a shocking amount of money for an additional 10 to 12 wins this season, but they'll also help subsiduze other teams' future payrolls and will likely miss the playoffs for the first time in most of their fans' memory.
Is it too little, too late? Only time will tell, but Steinbrenner still has a few days to pull the plug on a $21M gamble with the odds stacked against him!
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
The Difference between Police and Pigs
This would be a novel approach to dealing with some of the misinformed nusiances on our streets each day. I must admit I like the way Australia and New Zealand generally deal with criminals!
A New Zealand man who called police officers 'pigs' has been ordered to spend a day at a pig farm.
The 22-year-old has also been ordered to write an essay about the difference between pigs and police officers.
The man was charged with using offensive language after he hurled abuse at police during a trip to Auckland.
Community Magistrate Robyn Paterson at Tauranga District Court ordered him to spend a day at a pig farm and present a short essay on his experiences, reports The Bay of Plenty Times.
According to the newspaper, he wrote: "I was very, very drunk. I have stopped drinking because of what happened. I have wasted the police's time and my time."
He maintained the word pig could be found in the Oxford dictionary and was often used to describe police.
But added he had learned 'that there is nothing at all in common with a pig and an officer'.
Hogzilla in Georgia
An 11-year old boy from Alabama shot and killed a 1,050 pound wild hog last week in the back woods of Georgia. The hog is unofficially the largest feral hog on the record books. The hog had to be weighed at a semi-truck weighing station, and the head will take more than a month to be prepared and mounted.
If you'd like to read more information about this story, check out the following link: Hogzilla Story on FoxNews
Just be glad this young man did a service to everyone and that this hog won't be rummaging through the garbage in your back yard anytime soon!
If you'd like to read more information about this story, check out the following link: Hogzilla Story on FoxNews
Just be glad this young man did a service to everyone and that this hog won't be rummaging through the garbage in your back yard anytime soon!
Saturday, May 26, 2007
Amazing African Safari Footage
The following link takes you to a YouTube video that is just over 8 minutes long and is the most incredible footage I have ever seen of wild animals in Africa.
As you watch the video, you'll see a surprise attack by a pride of lions on a herd of water buffalo, a surprise attack in the water, a tug-of-war, a brief victory by one side, and then an incredible heroic and "happy" ending to this story.
African Safari Footage
As you watch the video, you'll see a surprise attack by a pride of lions on a herd of water buffalo, a surprise attack in the water, a tug-of-war, a brief victory by one side, and then an incredible heroic and "happy" ending to this story.
African Safari Footage
Enjoy the footage...I'm sure you've never seen anything like this before!
Thursday, May 24, 2007
The Availability Effect
Start off by answering these few questions:
1) What color car is the most popular on the road? ...what's second?
2) What's the ratio of AIDS deaths to skin cancer deaths in the U.S.?
3) Which are more common in the United States: murders or suicides?
4) What percentage of U.S. troops in Iraq have been killed? ...wounded?
5) How many illegal immigrants successfully crossed our southern border today?
We often hear discussions about how biased the media is or how much media reports affect our perceptions of common events, but most people don't realize just how much their opinions are being shaped by the reports they read and those reports they don't read.
In psychology research, there is a cognitive phenomenon known as the availability effect that provides an unconscious bias in decision makers' opinion formulation process. Simply stated, the availability effect states that information that is easily accessible to our brains carries more weight in our decisions and judgments than information that is either absent or less salient. Thus, if you're walking down the street and you notice several red cars driving by, you're likely to think red cars are very prevalent on the road. (Silver or gray cars are almost twice as common as any other car in the U.S. The next most common colors are white, blue, and red.)
When we read articles or watch news clips in the media about news they choose to present, we're being exposed to information and being deprived of information at the same time. If the news program or television show chooses to talk about AIDS research and the terrible effects of this deadly disease, then we subconsciously assign more weight to the gravity of this problem than we do to other diseases - like skin cancer, asthma, or leukemia - that don't get as much airtime.
(In the United States, it's estimated that 40,000 people - mostly sexually active adults - contract AIDS and about 16,000 die from AIDS each year. More than 60,000 people develop skin cancer and 12,000 die from skin cancer each year in the U.S. More than 6,000 people die from asthma each year, and more than 22,000 people - mostly children - will die from leukemia in the U.S. this year.)
When you pick up the newspaper and read about violent crimes and murders, you're bound to think that they're commonplace, especially when compared to other causes of death such as suicides. (There are more than 500,000 cases of reported "attempted" suicides in the U.S. each year with more than 32,000 deaths from suicide - twice as high as the 16,000 murders in the U.S. each year.)
When you understand the availability effect and how it alters your judgments, it's easier to understand how much influence the media has over our perceptions and opinions regarding a war across the world. Though the daily bombardment we receive regarding the number of U.S. deaths in Iraq is harrowing and heartbreaking, it does not paint a very objective picture of the mortality rate for U.S. troops. It's estimated that the average number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq each year since the war has begun is under 800. (Please note that I'm not trivializing the number or value of lives lost in Iraq; I'm merely attempting to point out the effects of a cognitive limitation.) When you take that number as a percentage of U.S. troops who are serving in Iraq each year, the percentage of troops killed each year is less than one half of one percent. Those troops seriously injured each year is far greater (nearly 6,000 each year), but that number is still less than 4% of the troops in Iraq each year. -- What if the newspapers and TV outlets reported that more than 100,000 troops had successful and safe missions today in Iraq? What if the news reported on the tens of thousands of troops who have safe and happy interactions with grateful people of Iraq every day? The truth is that the news outlets don't care about the success stories and the safety of the vast majority of our troops because those stories wouldn't get on the front page.
Finally, another serious issue of which we hear very little centers on illegal immigration. Though the problem is often discussed in political forums, the staggering numbers are often difficult to understand. Best estimates put the number of illegal immigrants crossing the southern border each year at approximately 500,000. This means that there are nearly 1,400 people walking across the southern border every single day!
Our best estimates of the total number of illegal immigrants currently living in the U.S. is anywhere from 12 to 20 million people. Though that number may not sound too large in a country the size of the U.S., consider that only 2 of our 50 states - Texas and Calfiornia - have more than 20 million people living in them! Another disturbing way to look at that number is to think of the number of states that could be filled with illegal immigrants today. If we were to replace every person living in all of the following states with illegal immigrants, we still wouldn't have room for them all: Wyoming, Vermont, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska, Delaware, Montana, Rhode Island, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Maine, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virgina, New Mexico, and Nevada!
Remember this: whenever you hear or read a news report, you're not only hearing what they choose to tell you, but you're not hearing what they choose not to tell you.
1) What color car is the most popular on the road? ...what's second?
2) What's the ratio of AIDS deaths to skin cancer deaths in the U.S.?
3) Which are more common in the United States: murders or suicides?
4) What percentage of U.S. troops in Iraq have been killed? ...wounded?
5) How many illegal immigrants successfully crossed our southern border today?
We often hear discussions about how biased the media is or how much media reports affect our perceptions of common events, but most people don't realize just how much their opinions are being shaped by the reports they read and those reports they don't read.
In psychology research, there is a cognitive phenomenon known as the availability effect that provides an unconscious bias in decision makers' opinion formulation process. Simply stated, the availability effect states that information that is easily accessible to our brains carries more weight in our decisions and judgments than information that is either absent or less salient. Thus, if you're walking down the street and you notice several red cars driving by, you're likely to think red cars are very prevalent on the road. (Silver or gray cars are almost twice as common as any other car in the U.S. The next most common colors are white, blue, and red.)
When we read articles or watch news clips in the media about news they choose to present, we're being exposed to information and being deprived of information at the same time. If the news program or television show chooses to talk about AIDS research and the terrible effects of this deadly disease, then we subconsciously assign more weight to the gravity of this problem than we do to other diseases - like skin cancer, asthma, or leukemia - that don't get as much airtime.
(In the United States, it's estimated that 40,000 people - mostly sexually active adults - contract AIDS and about 16,000 die from AIDS each year. More than 60,000 people develop skin cancer and 12,000 die from skin cancer each year in the U.S. More than 6,000 people die from asthma each year, and more than 22,000 people - mostly children - will die from leukemia in the U.S. this year.)
When you pick up the newspaper and read about violent crimes and murders, you're bound to think that they're commonplace, especially when compared to other causes of death such as suicides. (There are more than 500,000 cases of reported "attempted" suicides in the U.S. each year with more than 32,000 deaths from suicide - twice as high as the 16,000 murders in the U.S. each year.)
When you understand the availability effect and how it alters your judgments, it's easier to understand how much influence the media has over our perceptions and opinions regarding a war across the world. Though the daily bombardment we receive regarding the number of U.S. deaths in Iraq is harrowing and heartbreaking, it does not paint a very objective picture of the mortality rate for U.S. troops. It's estimated that the average number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq each year since the war has begun is under 800. (Please note that I'm not trivializing the number or value of lives lost in Iraq; I'm merely attempting to point out the effects of a cognitive limitation.) When you take that number as a percentage of U.S. troops who are serving in Iraq each year, the percentage of troops killed each year is less than one half of one percent. Those troops seriously injured each year is far greater (nearly 6,000 each year), but that number is still less than 4% of the troops in Iraq each year. -- What if the newspapers and TV outlets reported that more than 100,000 troops had successful and safe missions today in Iraq? What if the news reported on the tens of thousands of troops who have safe and happy interactions with grateful people of Iraq every day? The truth is that the news outlets don't care about the success stories and the safety of the vast majority of our troops because those stories wouldn't get on the front page.
Finally, another serious issue of which we hear very little centers on illegal immigration. Though the problem is often discussed in political forums, the staggering numbers are often difficult to understand. Best estimates put the number of illegal immigrants crossing the southern border each year at approximately 500,000. This means that there are nearly 1,400 people walking across the southern border every single day!
Our best estimates of the total number of illegal immigrants currently living in the U.S. is anywhere from 12 to 20 million people. Though that number may not sound too large in a country the size of the U.S., consider that only 2 of our 50 states - Texas and Calfiornia - have more than 20 million people living in them! Another disturbing way to look at that number is to think of the number of states that could be filled with illegal immigrants today. If we were to replace every person living in all of the following states with illegal immigrants, we still wouldn't have room for them all: Wyoming, Vermont, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska, Delaware, Montana, Rhode Island, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Maine, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virgina, New Mexico, and Nevada!
Remember this: whenever you hear or read a news report, you're not only hearing what they choose to tell you, but you're not hearing what they choose not to tell you.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Helping the Spurs?
In what has to be one of the more ridiculous rulings in sports of late, the NBA doled out suspensions following a blatant attack of the Suns' Steve Nash by the Spurs' Robert Horry in the final meaningless seconds of Phoenix's hard-fought victory over the Spurs to even the series.
Horry, the third or fourth man off the bench for San Antonio, was suspended two playoff games for body-checking Nash into the scorer's table as the Suns evened the series and headed back to Phoenix with momentum. Though Horry's suspension seems light given the viciousness of the hit, it was the NBA's suspension of two other players and their decision not to suspend a third that was most surprising and disappointing.
Upon seeing their team's leader and most valuable player being knocked down with a forearm to the upper chest and neck area, Amare Stoudamire and Boris Diaw of the Suns jumped out of their seats on the bench and took several steps towards their teammate Nash before the Suns' assistant coaches physically restrained them and forced them back to the bench. The players were not involved in the hurtful play, they were not involved in the ensuing scuffle, and they were not involved in the remainder of the game. They were, however, both suspended for the pivotal Game 5 of the series played in Phoenix, which the Suns lost. The cause for their suspension? They stepped onto the basketball court.
On the other side of the court, the Spurs' Tim Duncan stepped onto the court earlier in the game during an altercation following a dunk by Franciso Elson, though in a less "aggressive" manner. The NBA chose not to suspend Duncan, and he subsequently helped the Spurs win Game 5 in Phoenix. (After all, who normally plays opposite Duncan? Stoudamire.)
The NBA has a rule that assigns a mandatory suspension to any bench players who step onto the court during a melee, and it appears the rule doesn't make room for the most important games - or players - of the season. (Unless of course your name is Tim Duncan.)
Stoudamire is the Suns' starting center who is critical to the team's success, and Boris Diaw is the first or second player off the bench each night. Horry's trading 2 games of his meaningless contributions to the Spurs for one crucial game of 2 of the Suns' top-6 players appears to have been a successful strategy to help the Spurs knock off the Suns and move on in the NBA playoffs. The Suns did lose the pivotal Game 5 at home - though it seemed clear watching the game that the Suns would have won if all suspended players were present - and the Spurs went on to win Game 6 in San Antonio to wrap up the series. Horry continues to play his few minutes in the next round of the playoffs, and Stoudamire and the Suns can only sit and wonder what could have been if not for a premeditated attack on Nash and a few misplaced steps by Stoudamire and Diaw.
The fact that the NBA chose not to suspend Duncan for standing up and stepping onto the court causes even the casual observer to question whether the NBA dealt out the suspensions in an equitable manner.
Ironically, Amare Stoudamire had mentioned to reporters earlier in the series that he felt the Spurs were a "dirty team". The Spurs scoffed at the accusations, but Horry's "dirty" shot on Steve Nash resounds louder than any verbal response the team could present.
If the NBA allows scrubs from the bench to attack the opposing team's star players with little or no consequence, then why not take a cheap shot at the other team's leaders and gamble that you might get a few starters resting on the bench to stand up and take a step or two towards suspension and a series' loss?!
Robert Horry took a cheap shot at Steve Nash, but he's a hero in San Antonio. Before a superstar gets seriously injured and more playoff series are jeopardized by senseless suspensions, this is one problem the NBA needs to address.
Saturday, May 12, 2007
The Battle at the Border...
Those who think the problems with our borders are relatively harmless must not live anywhere near those borders. If you think the border issues center on innocent, hardworking people trying to find a better way of life in the United States, consider the following story from KOLD news in Tucson, Arizona which, unfortunately, is quite common in cities and towns near the border:"Mexican border violence has been on the rise and Santa Cruz Sheriff Tony Estrada says more and more of it is spilling over into the United States.
This comes on the heals of a violent ambush in Nogales-Sonora Monday night that left two local police officers riddled with bullets.
One of the officers died Thursday night. He was shot seven times. His partner was shot 15-times and is in critical condition in an Hermosillo Hospital.
Assailants opened fire with AK-47 assault rifles from a blue Ford Windstar and a white Chevrolet Cavalier that were parked on either side of the street.
Authorities say they suspect that Mexican drug smugglers are to blame."
As a result of the increased crime at the border, local police units are finding themselves without the manpower and equipment to handle the domestic issues - never mind dealing with drug smugglers and human trafickers using automatic weapons to kill police officers and Border Patrol agents.
Because of these most recent attacks and other similar attacks in the recent past, the Santa Cruz Sheriff's department has been reduced to 2/3 its original size and is struggling to put enough officers on the street to provide security to those American citizens in their protection. As a result, crime rates in Santa Cruz and other border areas are rising.
As I said before, this sort of news is commonplace in border areas, but you won't read about it on CNN.com or FoxNews.com, and you won't see any articles about it in your national papers. The problems with the border are real and they're becoming increasingly harmful.
So, the next time you think about the border as being an issue centering on innocent, hardworking people trying to provide a better life for their families - you're right. Those police officers and other law enforcement agents who are shot at, threatened, and often killed in the line of duty are innocent, they are hardworking, and they are trying to provide a better life for their families and yours. It's time America took notice of the real casualties of the battle at the border.
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
America's Approval Ratings...
I received this thought-provoking information in an e-mail attributed to Jay Leno, yes, that Jay Leno. I'm not sure if he really wrote this, but I enjoyed the perspective and hope you take some time to think about what he has to say...
"The other day I was reading Newsweek magazine and came across some poll data I found rather hard to believe. It must be true given the source, right?
The Newsweek poll alleges that 67 percent of Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is headed and 69 percent of the country is unhappy with the performance of the president. In essence 2/3's of the citizenry just ain't happy and want a change.
So being the knuckle dragger I am, I started thinking, ''What we are so unhappy about?'' Is it that we have electricity and running water 24 hours a day, 7 days a week? Is our unhappiness the result of having air conditioning in the summer and heating in the winter? Could it be that 95.4 percent of these unhappy folks have a job? Maybe it is the ability to walk into a grocery store at any time and see more food in moments than Darfur has seen in the last year?
Maybe it is the ability to drive from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean without having to present identification papers as we move through each state? Or possibly the hundreds of clean and safe motels we would find along the way that can provide temporary shelter? I guess having thousands of restaurants with varying cuisine from around the world is just not good enough. Or could it be that when we wreck our car, emergency workers show up and provide services to help all and even send a helicopter to take you to the hospital.
Perhaps you are one of the 70 percent of Americans who own a home. You may be upset with knowing that in the unfortunate case of a fire, a group of trained firefighters will appear in moments and use top notch equipment to extinguish the flames thus saving you, your family and your belongings. Or if, while at home watching one of your many flat screen TVs, a burglar or prowler intrudes, an officer equipped with a gun and a bullet-proof vest will come to defend you and your family against attack or loss.
This all in the backdrop of a neighborhood free of bombs or militias raping and pillaging the residents. Neighborhoods where 90 percent of teenagers own cell phones and computers. How about the complete religious, social and political freedoms we enjoy that are the envy of everyone in the world? Maybe that is what has 67 percent of you folks unhappy.
Fact is, we are the largest group of ungrateful, spoiled brats the world has ever seen. No wonder the world loves the U. S. , yet has a great disdain for its citizens. They see us for what we are. The most blessed people in the world who do nothing but complain about what we don't have, and what we hate about the country instead of thanking the good Lord we live here.
I know, I know. What about the president who took us into war and has no plan to get us out? The president who has a measly 31 percent approval rating? Is this the same president who guided the nation in the dark days after 9/11? The president that cut taxes to bring an economy out of recession? Could this be the same guy who has been called every name in the book for succeeding in keeping all the spoiled ungrateful brats safe from terrorist attacks? The commander in chief of an all-volunteer army that is out there defending you and me?
Did you hear how bad the President is on the news or talk show? Did this news affect you so much, make you so unhappy you couldn't take a look around for yourself and see all the good things and be glad? Think about it...... are you upset at the President because he actually caused you personal pain OR is it because the "Media" told you he was failing to kiss your sorry ungrateful behind every day. Make no mistake about it. The troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have volunteered to serve, and in many cases may have died for your freedom. There is currently no draft in this country. They didn't have to go. They are able to refuse to go and end up with either a ''general'' discharge, an ''other than honorable'' discharge or, worst case scenario, a ''dishonorable'' discharge after a few days in the brig.
So why then the flat-out discontentment in the minds of 69 percent of Americans? Say what you want but I blame it on the media. If it bleeds it leads and they specialize in bad news. Everybody will watch a car crash with blood and guts. How many will watch kids selling lemonade at the corner? The media knows this and media outlets are for-profit corporations. They offer what sells , and when criticized, try to defend their actions by "justifying" them in one way or another. Just ask why they tried to allow a murderer like O. J. Simpson to write a book about how he didn't kill his wife, but if he did he would have done it this way...... Insane!
Stop buying the negativism you are fed everyday by the media. Shut off the TV, burn Newsweek, and use the New York Times for the bottom of your bird cage. Then start being grateful for all we have as a country. There is exponentially more good than bad. We are among the most blessed people on Earth and should thank God several times a day, or at least be thankful and appreciative." "With hurricanes, tornados, fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to another, and with the threat of bird flu and terrorist attacks, "Are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?"
- Jay Leno
"The other day I was reading Newsweek magazine and came across some poll data I found rather hard to believe. It must be true given the source, right?The Newsweek poll alleges that 67 percent of Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is headed and 69 percent of the country is unhappy with the performance of the president. In essence 2/3's of the citizenry just ain't happy and want a change.
So being the knuckle dragger I am, I started thinking, ''What we are so unhappy about?'' Is it that we have electricity and running water 24 hours a day, 7 days a week? Is our unhappiness the result of having air conditioning in the summer and heating in the winter? Could it be that 95.4 percent of these unhappy folks have a job? Maybe it is the ability to walk into a grocery store at any time and see more food in moments than Darfur has seen in the last year?
Maybe it is the ability to drive from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean without having to present identification papers as we move through each state? Or possibly the hundreds of clean and safe motels we would find along the way that can provide temporary shelter? I guess having thousands of restaurants with varying cuisine from around the world is just not good enough. Or could it be that when we wreck our car, emergency workers show up and provide services to help all and even send a helicopter to take you to the hospital.
Perhaps you are one of the 70 percent of Americans who own a home. You may be upset with knowing that in the unfortunate case of a fire, a group of trained firefighters will appear in moments and use top notch equipment to extinguish the flames thus saving you, your family and your belongings. Or if, while at home watching one of your many flat screen TVs, a burglar or prowler intrudes, an officer equipped with a gun and a bullet-proof vest will come to defend you and your family against attack or loss.
This all in the backdrop of a neighborhood free of bombs or militias raping and pillaging the residents. Neighborhoods where 90 percent of teenagers own cell phones and computers. How about the complete religious, social and political freedoms we enjoy that are the envy of everyone in the world? Maybe that is what has 67 percent of you folks unhappy.
Fact is, we are the largest group of ungrateful, spoiled brats the world has ever seen. No wonder the world loves the U. S. , yet has a great disdain for its citizens. They see us for what we are. The most blessed people in the world who do nothing but complain about what we don't have, and what we hate about the country instead of thanking the good Lord we live here.
I know, I know. What about the president who took us into war and has no plan to get us out? The president who has a measly 31 percent approval rating? Is this the same president who guided the nation in the dark days after 9/11? The president that cut taxes to bring an economy out of recession? Could this be the same guy who has been called every name in the book for succeeding in keeping all the spoiled ungrateful brats safe from terrorist attacks? The commander in chief of an all-volunteer army that is out there defending you and me?
Did you hear how bad the President is on the news or talk show? Did this news affect you so much, make you so unhappy you couldn't take a look around for yourself and see all the good things and be glad? Think about it...... are you upset at the President because he actually caused you personal pain OR is it because the "Media" told you he was failing to kiss your sorry ungrateful behind every day. Make no mistake about it. The troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have volunteered to serve, and in many cases may have died for your freedom. There is currently no draft in this country. They didn't have to go. They are able to refuse to go and end up with either a ''general'' discharge, an ''other than honorable'' discharge or, worst case scenario, a ''dishonorable'' discharge after a few days in the brig.
So why then the flat-out discontentment in the minds of 69 percent of Americans? Say what you want but I blame it on the media. If it bleeds it leads and they specialize in bad news. Everybody will watch a car crash with blood and guts. How many will watch kids selling lemonade at the corner? The media knows this and media outlets are for-profit corporations. They offer what sells , and when criticized, try to defend their actions by "justifying" them in one way or another. Just ask why they tried to allow a murderer like O. J. Simpson to write a book about how he didn't kill his wife, but if he did he would have done it this way...... Insane!
Stop buying the negativism you are fed everyday by the media. Shut off the TV, burn Newsweek, and use the New York Times for the bottom of your bird cage. Then start being grateful for all we have as a country. There is exponentially more good than bad. We are among the most blessed people on Earth and should thank God several times a day, or at least be thankful and appreciative." "With hurricanes, tornados, fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to another, and with the threat of bird flu and terrorist attacks, "Are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?"
- Jay Leno
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
What it means to be an American...
It seems many of us who live in the United States have forgotten what it means to be an American. The United States of America has always brought people from around the globe into the world's most diverse, accepting, and unified country. As people become citizens of this great country, one privilege they are entitled to is the right to be called Americans. Some, however, choose not to be identified as Americans or choose only to be part-American in order to retain ties to former cultures and countries. In order to understand whether or not one should embrace the American name and the rights and privileges that are associated with living in this country, one must understand and appreciate the inclusive and encompassing nature of the designation.
Though this issue seems to be more prevalent in the United States today, this issue was also at the forefront of our leaders' minds 100 years ago. In 1907, President Theodore Roosevelt spoke on the issues of immigration, acceptance, and patriotism. Though his words ring out from dusty books and historical records, they are just as pertinent today as they were a century ago. Here is what he had to say:
Though this issue seems to be more prevalent in the United States today, this issue was also at the forefront of our leaders' minds 100 years ago. In 1907, President Theodore Roosevelt spoke on the issues of immigration, acceptance, and patriotism. Though his words ring out from dusty books and historical records, they are just as pertinent today as they were a century ago. Here is what he had to say:
"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.
But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
As the country faces unprecedented division and in-fighting among political, religious, cultural, and racial groups, it seems that President Roosevelt's message could be declared anew to all those who are privileged to bear the title of American. After all, if you think you need to amend your title to recognize your individuality and your unique differences from your neighbors, then you may not truly know what it means to be an American in the first place.
Man of the Year Finalists
I thought these were comical pictures depicting three finalists for a mock "Man of the Year" award.
Fortunately for the women of the world, not all of us can live up to the high standards set by these amazing men - if that's what you'd call these guys.
Enjoy!
Finalist 1
Finalist 2
Finalist 3
Gentlemen, don't fret if you weren't a finalist this year. Draw inspiration from these examples of chivalry, and you might be one of the finalists in 2007!
Fortunately for the women of the world, not all of us can live up to the high standards set by these amazing men - if that's what you'd call these guys.
Enjoy!
Finalist 1
Finalist 2
Finalist 3
Gentlemen, don't fret if you weren't a finalist this year. Draw inspiration from these examples of chivalry, and you might be one of the finalists in 2007!
Saved by Luck?
A man driving in the western United States lost control of his pickup truck and jumped a guard rail on a highway.The truck crossed the road into the other lane, crossed through the other lane, and jumped over some concrete barriers. The truck then flipped end-over-end over a drainage pipe and landed as you see in the picture below. (The red arrows show the path of the truck.)
Certainly there must have been Someone watching over him that morning as he survived the harrowing incident.
Imagine waking up or coming to and realizing that your truck was out of control, crossing over into another lane of traffic, jumping a guard rail, and then careening end-over-end over a storm drainage pipe!
How fortunate the man is to have survived this accident. I'm sure he and his family were grateful for the divine hand that certainly saved his life.
If you're not so certain that there was some divine intervention in saving this man's life, take a look at the second picture below and imagine the second wave of gratitude this man must have felt when he realized how "lucky" he really was.
Monday, May 7, 2007
Considering a Life of Crime?
I know life can be tough and some have thoughts of living a life of crime to try and get an "easy" score of some quick cash. Before you quit your minimum-wage day job and embark on a crime spree knocking over liquor stores, consider the following gentleman's issues:
You just might reconsider attending this guy's school of hard knocks and stick to your day job!
Sunday, May 6, 2007
$1M Appearance Fee...
The New York Yankees have had a tough beginning to the Major League Baseball season. Their struggles have been largely due to an injury-plagued starting rotation and a fatigued and largely ineffective bullpen. With a brief announcement on Sunday afternoon, things are beginning to look up for the Pinstripes. In what many - including me - predicted well before the season began, Roger Clemens has signed a one-year contract to return to the Bronx for one last fling.
The announcement was made during the 7th-inning stretch of Sunday's game against the Mariners. Using the stadium's public address system, Clemens announced to the fans in attendance, "Well, they came and got me out of Texas and I can tell you it's a privilege to be back. I'll be talking to y'all soon." With that, the hopes of Yankees fans around the globe were immediately resurrected.
Notice however, that I didn't say the hopes of the Yankees' themselves were immediately revived. With Clemens' return comes a steep pricetag and lofty expectations. His contract is valued at just about $28 million dollars this season, but Clemens will only earn about $18.5 million because of his late arrival on the Yankees' roster. Still, with only 5 months remaining in the season and an expected 20 starts for Clemens, the current legend and future Hall of Fame pitcher will earn approximately $1M each time he steps to the pitching mound this season - a pretty steep show-up fee. With the Yankees currently sitting near the bottom of the American League standings, the Rocket's return will have to make a significant impact to push this team into the postseason.
By locking up $18.5M for the remainder of this year on Roger Clemens, the Yankees may have taken themselves out of the running for mid-season trade possibilities for high-priced superstars who may be available if their current teams are out of contention early.
Ironically, the Yankees won today's game against the Mariners due to outstanding pitching from a young (and very inexpensive) starter and a suddenly revitalized bullpen. Though nobody believes the Yankees could have contended with their current pitching woes, it's not a sure bet that their million-dollar showup fee each time Clemens takes the mound will pay off in the end. Only time will tell, but there's one 45-year old Texan who's certain to win this year, regardless of where the Yankees wind up.
The announcement was made during the 7th-inning stretch of Sunday's game against the Mariners. Using the stadium's public address system, Clemens announced to the fans in attendance, "Well, they came and got me out of Texas and I can tell you it's a privilege to be back. I'll be talking to y'all soon." With that, the hopes of Yankees fans around the globe were immediately resurrected.Notice however, that I didn't say the hopes of the Yankees' themselves were immediately revived. With Clemens' return comes a steep pricetag and lofty expectations. His contract is valued at just about $28 million dollars this season, but Clemens will only earn about $18.5 million because of his late arrival on the Yankees' roster. Still, with only 5 months remaining in the season and an expected 20 starts for Clemens, the current legend and future Hall of Fame pitcher will earn approximately $1M each time he steps to the pitching mound this season - a pretty steep show-up fee. With the Yankees currently sitting near the bottom of the American League standings, the Rocket's return will have to make a significant impact to push this team into the postseason.
By locking up $18.5M for the remainder of this year on Roger Clemens, the Yankees may have taken themselves out of the running for mid-season trade possibilities for high-priced superstars who may be available if their current teams are out of contention early.
Ironically, the Yankees won today's game against the Mariners due to outstanding pitching from a young (and very inexpensive) starter and a suddenly revitalized bullpen. Though nobody believes the Yankees could have contended with their current pitching woes, it's not a sure bet that their million-dollar showup fee each time Clemens takes the mound will pay off in the end. Only time will tell, but there's one 45-year old Texan who's certain to win this year, regardless of where the Yankees wind up.
A Simple,Thank You!
This is a story I recently received by e-mail:
Last week, while traveling to Chicago on business, I noticed a Marine sergeant traveling with a folded flag, but did not put two and two together. After we boarded our flight, I turned to the sergeant, who'd been invited to sit in First Class (across from me), and inquired if he was heading home. "No", he responded.
Heading out I asked? "No. I'm escorting a soldier home."
Going to pick him up? "No. He is with me right now. He was killed in Iraq. I'm taking him home to his family."
The realization of what he had been asked to do hit me like a punch to the gut. It was an honor for him. He told me that, although he didn't know the soldier, he had delivered the news of his passing to the soldier's family and felt as if he knew them after many conversations in so few days. I turned back to him, extended my hand, and said, Thank you. Thank you for doing what you do so my family and I can do what we do.
Upon landing in Chicago the pilot stopped short of the gate and made the following announcement over the intercom. "Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to note that we have had the honor of having Sergeant Steeley of the United States Marine Corps join us on this flight. He is escorting a fallen comrade back home to his family. I ask that you please remain in your seats when we open the forward door to allow Sergeant Steeley to deplane and receive his fellow soldier. We will then turn off the seat belt sign."
Without a sound, all went as requested. I noticed the sergeant saluting the casket as it was brought off the plane, and his action made me realize that I am proud to be an American. So here's a public Thank You to our military Men and Women for what you do so we can live the way we do.
signed: Stuart Margel -- Washington, D.C.
Last week, while traveling to Chicago on business, I noticed a Marine sergeant traveling with a folded flag, but did not put two and two together. After we boarded our flight, I turned to the sergeant, who'd been invited to sit in First Class (across from me), and inquired if he was heading home. "No", he responded.
Heading out I asked? "No. I'm escorting a soldier home."
Going to pick him up? "No. He is with me right now. He was killed in Iraq. I'm taking him home to his family."
The realization of what he had been asked to do hit me like a punch to the gut. It was an honor for him. He told me that, although he didn't know the soldier, he had delivered the news of his passing to the soldier's family and felt as if he knew them after many conversations in so few days. I turned back to him, extended my hand, and said, Thank you. Thank you for doing what you do so my family and I can do what we do.
Upon landing in Chicago the pilot stopped short of the gate and made the following announcement over the intercom. "Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to note that we have had the honor of having Sergeant Steeley of the United States Marine Corps join us on this flight. He is escorting a fallen comrade back home to his family. I ask that you please remain in your seats when we open the forward door to allow Sergeant Steeley to deplane and receive his fellow soldier. We will then turn off the seat belt sign."
Without a sound, all went as requested. I noticed the sergeant saluting the casket as it was brought off the plane, and his action made me realize that I am proud to be an American. So here's a public Thank You to our military Men and Women for what you do so we can live the way we do.signed: Stuart Margel -- Washington, D.C.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
